The actual rule
Section 146 of the Gambling Regulation Act 2024 restricts licensees from engaging others — influencers, content creators — to advertise gambling content on their behalf on social media or video-sharing platforms. GRAI's guidance gives a specific, worked mechanism: an influencer's content about a licensee can only reach someone who already follows both the influencer and the licensee's own account on that same platform.
What still counts as fine: "incidental" advertising
GRAI's guidance carves out incidental exposure — a licensee's logo, trademark, or sponsorship being visible or audible at an event, such as stadium signage during a match broadcast. The distinction is intent and format: passive visibility at a sponsored event isn't the same as a deliberate promotional post or paid endorsement.
Merchandise aimed at children
A related, specific prohibition: operators can't sell or provide clothing or merchandise carrying a gambling brand's name, logo, or trademark where it's intended to be worn or used by a child. This sits alongside the broader age verification and underage gambling protections already covered on this site.
Why GRAI built the rule this way
The "follow both accounts" mechanism is a deliberate design choice, not an accident of drafting — it converts gambling advertising on social platforms from a broadcast/discovery model (reaching people who've never encountered the brand) into an opt-in model (reaching only people who've already actively chosen to connect with the brand directly). It's the social-media equivalent of the requirement elsewhere in the Act that adults must opt in to receive marketing communications at all.
Related reading
See VIP schemes, free bets and bonuses banned for the related restriction on personalised offers, and the TV/radio advertising watershed for the broadcast-side equivalent.